iphone blog

March 11, 2010

SDK Update: New Gestures Implementations & No More Camera Hints

Just two weeks since the last update, Apple released last night a new beta version of the iPhone OS SDK. Unlike the previous ones however, this fourth beta doesn’t seem to be bringing much for us to speculate about.

The main novelty, if we can call it one, is the presence of some hints of an official implementation for new touch gestures. Nothing major, since these were already long documented by Apple and possible with some fiddling. They will however make it much easier for developers to enhance their apps with gestures like triple tap, long tap or rotate.

Lastly, the camera references have now disappeared, and the rest of the update seems to focus on fixing some minor bugs, not that surprising getting that close to the iPad’s launch.

Related Posts

See more here:
SDK Update: New Gestures Implementations & No More Camera Hints

March 10, 2010

Verizon Wants Your iPad On Its 3G, Via MiFi

In what looks like a very smart business move, Verizon is apparently pushing its staffers to promote MiFi to future iPad owners.

As you know by now, the WiFi-only iPad will be launched April 3rd by Apple, followed by a 3G version which will come only by the end of April. The 3G iPad will come with an opt-in $30/month unlimited data plan from AT&T, but if you just can’t wait, or hate AT&T, Verizon wants your business.

Their MiFi, which you might know already, is a mobile WiFi hotspot, a little device which connects to Verizon’s data network, and lets you connect up to five devices to it via WiFi. Verizon believes it would go great with your WiFi iPad, and has sent an internal information to its employee to promote just that.

Alright, the data connection will cost your more than if you go through AT&T at $60/month for 5GB of data. On the good side however, you’ll be able to share it with all your other devices, and a lot sooner.

Interested?

Related Posts

Read the original here:
Verizon Wants Your iPad On Its 3G, Via MiFi

TiPb Apps 4.3: Street Fighter IV for iPhone (GDC 2010)

Screen shot 2010-03-10 at 5.20.02 AM

Live from GDC 2010 Rene talks to Tezuka-san, Street Fighter IV [$9.99 - iTunes link] iPhone producer for Capcom (via translator) about making Street Fighter for the iPhone and iPod touch, getting the controls right, and whether or not we might see Street Fighter for the iPad.

Tezuka-san points out how Capcom decided to make the controls very customizable, allowing users to choose whether they want the button low down, in the middle, or high up, and set the level of transparency. This means you can hold the iPhone or iPod touch anyway you like and set up the controls just the way you like.

I had a chance to play it just before release and while I got my butt kicked in multiplayer, the game looked gorgeous and handled very well. I could pull off what few moves I remembered from my childhood in the arcade, and I could resort to button (er… screen) mashing when all else failed. (Yes, just like my childhood in the arcade.)

For the iPad, they’re going to sit down and figure out how the controls work and what the experience is like on that screen with that form factor. If it makes sense, they’ll do it. If not, there are other Capcom games that certainly might. It’s all about the quality of the end product for them.

Watch along after the break!

YouTube link

TiPb Apps 4.3: Street Fighter IV for iPhone (GDC 2010) is a story by TiPb. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

TiPb – The #1 iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch Blog

Verizon Wants to Sell You Data for Your iPad… via MiFi

vzw-ipad-opportunity

Verizon is looking to turn no-iPad 3G lemons in iPad Wi-Fi + MiFi lemonade by craftily counter-programming the official AT&T data plans with their own potent portable internet and router combo, says Engadget.

You’ll save $130 off the price of the iPad 3G, but a 5GB Verizon MiFi plan will run you $60 vs. “unlimited” AT&T data for $30. Then again, you can use the MiFi for more than one device (and more than one at a time).

So, is Verizon’s plan a good one? Would you consider iPad Wi-Fi + Verizon MiFi on April 3rd rather than iPad 3G on AT&T in late April?

Verizon Wants to Sell You Data for Your iPad… via MiFi is a story by TiPb. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

TiPb – The #1 iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch Blog

A Belated New Year’s Resolution: No Walled Gardens!

Filed under: gigaom — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , — @ 1:00 am

The Comedy Central-Hulu announcement last week made me recall my New Year’s resolution, one that I wanted to share publicly, and encourage you to embrace as well. It is simple in its concept, but epic in scope. It involves eliminating something from your routine, something unhealthy –- not for your body, however, but for your wallet, and the world at large. In short, I’m asking you to join me in giving up Walled Gardens.

What does that mean? Well basically it means to eschew controlled environments, whatever the cost , and to embrace open platforms with all your heart. In practice, here’s what you’ll have to give up:

iPhone and iPad: This first stipulation is a doozy. Resolve to give up your iPhone, and walk past the iPad display without ponying up. Why do this? Well despite Apple’s claims of embracing everyone, the iPhone and iPad are huge walled gardens. You can’t just load any app -– no, you’re forced to load just those programs that some soulless corporate drone on Infinity Loop deems “appropriate.”

Yes, that means T&A from Sports Illustrated, but not from many other similarly legitimate sources. Want your iPhone to quack like a duck? Sorry. Google Voice, Groovy Sharks — nope, can’t use ‘em, says Apple — and the list just goes on and on.

And the iPad looks to be even worse. Heck you can’t even watch Flash on the darned thing, which tends to obviate much of the most interesting content on the web. Luckily, there are many other awesome alternatives, including the Motorola Backflip, Nexus One, and other great Android phones. And expect everyone else’s pad — from the sexy U1 Hybrid from Lenovo to Dell’s new super-small slate — to deliver more functionality.

These pads will deliver an open, anything-goes platform, for less money, probably. I know it’ll be hard, but this year, vow to embrace an open marketplace of apps, video, web sites and books, rather than a locked down, overpriced, shiny gewgaw.

Kindle: Speaking of books, are you thinking of a Kindle? That’s also a walled garden. Want to buy a book? You have to go through Amazon. Sure you can load your own stuff onto the Kindle, but only via a few formats, and you even have to pay for that privilege. Many other types of e-books simply don’t convert well at all. The Kindle lacks good support for tables and monospaced fonts, has lousy PDF rendering, and worst of all, doesn’t even support the open ePub format.

The lack of ePub means you can’t borrow e-books from your library and read them on the Kindle. It’s as if Jeff Bezos is declaring war on the local library! But even worse, the Kindle is the roach motel of e-books: Books go in, but they never come out.

Luckily there are other options. f you must have an e-reader today, opt for Sony’s latest touch version. But if you can wait, do. There were zillions of e-readers on display at CES, and by this fall we should see an explosion of low-cost E Ink-based alternatives that support open standards and a wide variety of off-the-shelf books.

Hulu: And that leads me to Hulu. Although web-based, Hulu is another walled garden, locking you into its platform. Want to see it on Boxee? Sorry. Oh, well, maybe you can now, but probably not tomorrow. What about other over the top services? Not likely. Hulu is designed for PC viewing only, even though any 15-year-old can easily figure out how to connect a PC to the big screen. And now Hulu’s been out-gardened by Comedy Central, which is pulling its programs, among them “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report,” viewable only at ComedyCentral.com –- another walled garden!

NBC’s Olympics coverage was yet another ridiculous approach to walling off viewership and screwing consumers. And don’t even get me started on TV Everywhere, the misguided attempt to transmogrify the ultimate walled garden –- cable TV –- into a narrowly protected online universe. It just isn’t going to work, guys. Instead, embrace open video platforms like YouTube –- which you can embed and watch everywhere — along with Boxee, Roku, Popcorn Hour, Play On and other wide open services and providers (including Revision3, where I work).

Why? Because these walled gardens are not only expensive, they lock you in to a never-ending merry-go-round of price hikes, poor customer service and reduced choice. In the end they will turn the Internet into a monolithic series of silos, accessible only to those with the money, influence or power. The promise of a democratic medium that lets you reach the entire world with your voice, your vision and your creativity will be gone forever, locked behind corporate palaces that will turn us all into nameless, faceless drones.

Well, maybe it won’t be that bad. But still, I’m staying away from the iPhone, the iPad, the Kindle and Hulu this year. And you should, too.

Jim Louderback is CEO of Revision3. He was previously vice president of Ziff Davis Media and Editor-in-Chief of PC Magazine and PCMag.com.

See the rest here:
A Belated New Year’s Resolution: No Walled Gardens!

March 9, 2010

Customize Your Breaking News With NewsAlerts

Newshounds have a lot of choices when it comes to staying connected with current events. RSS feeds and countless apps are available that provide push notifications for breaking news but none has offered the simplicity of receiving stories based solely on specific keywords.

NewsAlerts is a new app that hopes to resolve that with the simple feature of choosing topics most important to you for delivery. Instead of getting breaking news that is deemed important by the editors of a news organization, you get to customize the news to keep current with what interests you.

The app’s interface is extremely simple. A plus button at the top of the home screen is all you need to access to input your keywords. With the initial download (currently on sale for 99 cents) you are provided with 10 keywords that you can enter for alerts. Additional words can be obtained via an in app purchase. Once a keyword is entered, you will receive a push notification every time that word is mentioned in the media.

The app does provide you with a good level of customization by specifying how many alerts to send, what time of the day to send them and giving you options to block out specific news sources. And like other news apps, sharing interesting articles you find is easy with in app options to email the link or sending the story to your Twitter account.

NewsAlerts is a simple app that does what it advertises. It’s an easy way to have news delivered to you without having to sift through long lists of RSS feeds or scanning the web for content that is interesting to you.

NewsAlerts is currently on sale for 99 cents (down from $2.99) so go check it out, on the App Store.

Related Posts

Read the rest here:
Customize Your Breaking News With NewsAlerts

Will Books Be The Next To Go In Apple’s App Store Purge?

Over the last month or so, Apple has clearly been on a mission to trim down the App Store to applications that are useful and family friendly. First, it removed thousands of sex-themed applications, and it’s also been making moves to crack down on overly simplistic ‘cookie cutter‘ apps. But there may be yet another segment of the App Store on the chopping block: Books. According to a recent report, books represent 27,000 of the App Store’s 150,000 applications, making them the most abundant type of application on the App Store. And they’re becoming increasingly redundant.

Before developers get alarmed, I should make it clear that I haven’t heard anything about Apple removing the myriad book apps from the App Store. But given the impending release of Apple’s own iBooks app alongside the iPad, and the recent App Store cleanup spree, I won’t be at all surprised if they do something to change the way books are treated on the platform.

There are a few reasons why Apple might want to do this. First and foremost, there’s the user experience for new iPad users. One of the iPad’s highly touted features is its ability to read books using the new iBooks application, which serves as both a book store and a very nice looking eBook reader. But according to Apple’s website, iBooks won’t come pre-installed on the iPad. You can be sure that Apple will give its own application top billing on the App Store, but there will still be plenty of room for confusion.

Imagine what will happen when a new iPad user boots up the device for the first time and decides to buy Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, but instead of doing it through the iBooks app, they simply run a search on the App Store. There are at least 25 different standalone applications featuring the book, selling for between 99 cents and five dollars. Each of these applications has its own book reading interface, many of which aren’t nearly as polished as the iBooks app Apple has shown off. And every time the user downloads a different book from the App Store, they’ll be using yet another new interface. That doesn’t seem like the sort of user experience Apple typically strives for.

And then there’s the issue of App Store clutter. As I mentioned before, Apple seems to be focused on eliminating many of the frivolous applications from the App Store. There are plenty of high quality book applications available, but there are also quite a few — perhaps even the majority — that amount to little more than a Project Gutenberg text wrapped in an overly basic reader. Which is exactly the sort of thing Apple is tired of. Books already make up the most popular category of application on the App Store; if they keep growing at this pace, they’ll eventually represent the majority of applications available.

To be clear, I don’t think Apple is going to ban book markets like Amazon’s Kindle reader or Stanza. These generally have much more functionality than a basic book app, and eliminating them would be blatantly anti-competitive. That may not have any legal repercussions, but Apple badly needs high quality applications on the iPad to make it a success — it would be unwise to scare off major developers wary of having their app blocked because Apple has a competing product (this is one reason, I think, that iBooks is not included with the iPad).

All of that said, there are some reasons why Apple may not do anything on this front. For one, Apple is probably making a decent chunk of revenue from paid book applications, so it may not particularly care whether it gets its revenue cut from the app vendor or the publisher itself through iBooks. And then there’s the PR cost. Apple got away with unceremoniously removing thousands of ’sexy’ applications because nobody is going to stand up and defend their right to view titillating bikini photos. But if Apple pulled thousands of books from the store, the headlines could be more damaging, with imagery of book bonfires abound (despite the fact that the same content would likely be available through iBooks).

Or Apple may find some middle ground. It could hide book apps from iPad search results and keep them iPhone-only (though the iPhone will probably get a version of iBooks, too). It might just start blocking new book submissions but leave the existing apps be. Or perhaps it will include some kind of banner on relevant searches like “Did you know this title is also available on iBooks?”. In any case, while I am by no means advocating such a change, I suspect that if you want to download one of these standalone book applications in the not-so-distant future, you’re going to have to go out of your way to do it.

Update: As commenter Peter Cooper points out, iBooks is only going to be available in the US at launch, and some developers are working towards books that can do far more than ‘normal’ book readers (including iBooks). So there are clearly reasons to keep the Book section intact, but I still suspect changes are coming to the way Apple handles book applications (at least the basic ones).

Apple’s iBooks

Top image by Austinevan

Information provided by CrunchBase


View original here:
Will Books Be The Next To Go In Apple’s App Store Purge?

March 8, 2010

Why Isn’t the iPad Getting Some of the iPhone’s Default Apps? [Apple]

Recently we saw the first iPad ad, but in it we didn’t see some of the default apps found on the iPhone. Why aren’t the Stocks, Calculator, Clock, Weather and Voice Memos apps on the iPad? Here’s a possible explanation.

According to Daring Fireball, it boils down to design and Steve Jobs’ perfectionism:

Ends up that just blowing up iPhone apps to fill the iPad screen looks and feels weird, even if you use higher-resolution graphics so that nothing looks pixelated. So they were scrapped by you-know-who. Perhaps they’ll appear on the iPad in some re-imagined form this summer with OS 4.0, but when the iPad ships next month, there won’t be versions of these apps. At least that’s the story I’ve heard from a few well-informed little birdies.

Part of me hopes those little birdies are wrong. I’m far too attached to the Clock and Calculator apps and would dread having to find alternatives in the App Store. [Daring Fireball]




See original here:
Why Isn’t the iPad Getting Some of the iPhone’s Default Apps? [Apple]

If the iPhone can do video calling, will AT&T’s network handle the pressure?

Posted by Joel Evans @ 2:14 pm

Categories: Apple, Wireless carriers, iPad, iPhone, mobile services

Tags: Apple iPhone, Network, Video Call, AT&T Corp., Video, Corporate Communications, Marketing, Joel Evans

Apple is known for keeping a tight lid on any information related to its upcoming products. As a result, rumors fly high and it’s not until the day of release or the official announcement of a new product that the public knows for sure what’s coming from Apple. To that end, it’s no surprise that the latest rumor around the “iPhone 4G” supporting video calling is getting everyone excited.

Here’s some quick background information: video calling on the iPhone has been rumored for a while, and even before the iPhone 3GS made its debut, there were rumored photos floating around, depicting a spot for a front facing camera. Well, the 3GS has been out for a while now, so the people are hoping for a refresh in the form of the “iPhone 4G”. What makes these latest rumors around video calling a bit more possible, though, is that a substantial mobile operator in the UK seems to be the source of them.

According to FSM.com, the UK’s O2 has updated its latest iPhone plans and in this update is the addition of prices for video calls. While that might be enough to get the rumors really flowing, the system files in the latest SDK are also showing the ability to do video calls.

All signs are definitely pointing towards video calls coming–at least to the UK. The bigger question will be whether or not AT&T will offer the video calling and if it does, will the network be able to handle it?

Recently AT&T mentioned that it wasn’t worried about its network’s ability to handle the traffic from the iPad since it figured most people would use it on Wi-Fi. With the next generation iPhone potentially offering video calling, one can only assume that AT&T will once again be called out for its network capacity issues.

As an iPhone user I would like the ability to do video calling but definitely don’t want to see my quality of service suffer. It seems that my iPhone is finally working the way I need it to on the AT&T network, but with the introduction of the iPad and the potential of video calling, my iPhone will no doubt suffer the consequences.

View original post here:
If the iPhone can do video calling, will AT&T’s network handle the pressure?

Cameron Daigle’s “Is the iPad Just a Big iPhone?” UI Presentation from PodCamp Nashville

griffin-podcamp-talk.001

Cameron Daigle’s “is the iPad just a big iPhone” user interface presentation from PodCamp Nashville. Note, the second slide is a gigantic “NO.”

[via Daring Fireball]

Cameron Daigle’s “Is the iPad Just a Big iPhone?” UI Presentation from PodCamp Nashville is a story by TiPb. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

TiPb – The #1 iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch Blog

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress